International Comparison for Earned Doctoral Degrees
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Doctoral Degrees Conferred 1999-2000, Volume 48, Number 2
The above list contains the names and thesis titles of recipients of doctoral degrees in the mathematical sciences (July 1, 1999, to June 30, 2000) reported in the 2000 Annual Survey of the Mathematical Sciences by 237 departments in 158 universities in the United States. Each entry contains the name of the recipient and the thesis title. The number in parentheses following the name of the univ...
متن کاملDoctoral Degrees Conferred 2001–2002, Volume 50, Number 2
The above list contains the names and thesis titles of recipients of doctoral degrees in the mathematical sciences (July 1, 2001, to June 30, 2002) reported in the 2002 Annual Survey of the Mathematical Sciences by 217 departments in 149 universities in the United States. Each entry contains the name of the recipient and the thesis title. The number in parentheses following the name of the univ...
متن کاملDoctoral Degrees Conferred 2005–2006, Volume 54, Number 2
The above list contains the names and thesis titles of recipients of doctoral degrees in the mathematical sciences (July 1, 2005, to June 30, 2006) reported in the 2006 Annual Survey of the Mathematical Sciences by 222 departments in 164 universities in the United States. Each entry contains the name of the recipient and the thesis title. The number in parentheses following the name of the univ...
متن کاملDoctoral Degrees Conferred 2002-2003, Volume 51, Number 2
The above list contains the names and thesis titles of recipients of doctoral degrees in the mathematical sciences (July 1, 2002, to June 30, 2003) reported in the 2003 Annual Survey of the Mathematical Sciences by 223 departments in 160 universities in the United States. Each entry contains the name of the recipient and the thesis title. The number in parentheses following the name of the univ...
متن کاملInnovation in Doctoral Degrees Designed for Adult Learners: A Hybrid Model in Personal Financial Planning
Writing what has since become a seminal article in the assessment of doctoral training, Nyquist (2002) stated that “we need to honestly assess the efficacy of the PhD now to ensure that its recipients continue to make the kinds of contributions in the public and private spheres that the nation needs to remain strong” (p. 14). Nyquist went on to document shortcomings with the way in which nearly...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of JSEE
سال: 2013
ISSN: 1341-2167,1881-0764
DOI: 10.4307/jsee.61.6_93